Izdelki za oskrbo rane
Poliuretanske pene z mehkim silikonom Safetac
Mepilex
Mepilex je udobna in nežna9,10,17,22 poliuretanska pena z mehkim silikonom, ki učinkovito vpija in uravnava izloček7,8,17-21 ter se optimalno prilagaja rani. Primerna je za akutne in kronične rane z večjo količino izločka. Tehnologija Safetac zmanjšuje bolečine15-21 ter poškodbe rane in novo nastalega tkiva1,2,12,13 med prevezami. Manj bolečin pomeni nižjo raven stresa pri pacientih11, kar posledično pozitivno vpliva tudi na proces celjenja rane. Poleg tega tehnologija Safetac zaščiti okolico rane tako, da zatesni njene robove in zagotavlja dodatno zaščito pred maceracijo5,6,14,15. Oblogo je mogoče rezati in povsem prilagoditi tudi ranam na težko dostopnih mestih3,4,17,22. Ne drsi pod sekundarno pritrdilno oblogo. Zaščitni poliuretanski film je prepusten za vlago in vodne hlape, izločka pa ne prepušča. Mepilex je na voljo tudi v obliki za oskrbo ran na peti.
Področja uporabe
Obloga je namenjena oskrbi številnih vrst ran z malo do veliko izločka, kot so razjede na nogi, diabetična stopala, razjede zaradi pritiska, travmatske rane, rane s poškodovano okolno kožo, opekline, odrgnine in raztrganine.
Deluje tudi pod kompresijsko terapijo. Potrebuje dodatno fiksacijo. Priporočamo uporabo v kombinaciji s cevastim povojem Tubifast. Za rane z majhno količino izločka uporabite tanjše obloge Mepilex EM/Lite.
Nabor oblog Mepilex (sterilno pakiranje)
| Koda artikla | Naziv artikla | Pakiranje kos/zavitek | NENSI šifra |
|---|---|---|---|
| 294000 | Mepilex 12,5 x 12,5 cm | 5 | 1014218 |
| 294201 | Mepilex 10 x 21 cm | 5 | 1014207 |
| 294310 | Mepilex 17,5 x 17,5 cm | 5 | 1014380 |
| 294410 | Mepilex 21 x 22 cm | 5 | 1007237 |
| 294500 | Mepilex 20 x 50 cm | 2 | – |
| 288200 | Mepilex Peta 13 x 21 cm | 5 | – |
Reference
- White R. A Multinational survey of the assessment of pain when removing dressings. Wounds UK, 2008.
- Dykes PJ et al. Effect of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin. Journal of Wound Care, 2001.
- Silverstein P, et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32(6):617-626.Taherinejad and Hamberg. Antimicrobial effect of a silver-containing foam dressing on a broad range of common wound pathogens. Measured in vitro. Poster publication, WUWHS 2008.
- Hamberg K, Jakobsen C, Correlation of silver release and antimicrobial effect of silver-containing wound dressing in vitro, Poster presentation at EWMA Conference, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
- External test, NAMSA, Study no: 05C48747_01
- External test, NAMSA, Study no: 06_C60855_02 and 06_C60858_02
- Palomar F, Treatment and Care of chronic wounds and perilesional skin using a selfadhesive silicone and foam dressing. Spanish Congress of Dermatology nursing in Benalmádena (Málaga) March 2007.
- Young MJ, Robbie J Management of the diabetic foot: A guide to the assessment and management of diabetic foot ulcers, The Diabetic Foot, 2002 5(3)
- Barrett S. 2009 A review article examines the role of MepilexAg, the rapid and sustained antimicrobial action of silver with the benefits of Safetac technology.
- Upton D et al. The Impact of Atraumatic Vs Conventional Dressings on Pain and Stress in Patients with Chronic Wounds. Journal of Wound Care, 2012.
- Mölnlycke Health Care. Determination of antimicrobial activity of Mepilex Ag against a broad range of wound pathogens using corrected zone of inhibition method. Report no. 20051215-007. 2005. Data on file.
- Wounds International. International consensus. Appropriate use of silver dressings in wounds. An expert working group consensus. London, UK: Wounds Int; 2012 [cited 14 Sep 2017]. URL: http://www.woundsinternational.com/media/issues/567/files/content_10381.pdf.
- Woo, K. & Bergström, C. An Open Randomised Cross-over Investigation Assessing Perceived Pain at Dressing Change Comparing A Soft Silicone Dressing, Mepilex® Border, with a Adhesive hydrocellular polyurethane dressing, Allevyn® Adhesive in Patients with chronic ulcer (Clinical Investigation Report (MXB408, Part A, Mölnlycke Health Care), 2007).
- Johnstone A, et al. Innovations in the reduction of pressure ulceration and pain in critical care. Wounds UK. 2013;9(3):76-80
- Viamontes L, et al. Evaluation study of the properties of two adhesive foam dressings. Br J Nurs. 2003;12(11 Supplement): S43-44, S46-49.
- Bateman, S. Principles of preventative foot care. Br J Community Nurs. 2014;(Supplement):S32-S38.
- Gee Kee EL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children. Burns. 2015;41(5):946-955.
- Gee Kee EL et al. Cost-effectiveness of silver dressings for paediatric partial thickness burns: An economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial. Burns 2017, 43(4):724-732.
- Gee Kee EL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children. Burns. 2015;41(5):946-955.